Looking at an observational perspective, Artificial Intelligence (AI) modifying whole mankind’s life has been becoming universal with contemporary civilians. Hence, numerous robots automated to support human in working and doing the household chores have both benefits and drawbacks. As far as I am concerned, daily activities completed by robots have more disadvantages prevailed over good sides.
Indeed, being a supporter of the idea, I should point out some convincing rationales to cast light on my own belief. First thing first, it is apparent that AI equipment is costly, therefore, just wealthy people having lucrative income can purchase it in their houses or offices. To be specific, recently, the majority of citizens living in their budget have been so hard to own these kinds of technological devices. What is more, it is universally accepted that should robots have the difficulties in systems, it will be so arduous to amend them comprehensively. Particularly, there has been barely specialized machines lately which can repair robots and surely it will takes abundant days, even a few months to service these gadgets. Take my uncles as an quintessential example, he used to buy a household robot cleaning the house, however, after a year it had some troubles with technique and he made up his mind to throw away it ultimately.
On the contrary, owning modern devices like robots still makes advantaged influence on more and more people’s activities. To be more detailed, robots has contributed to completing domestic chores efficiently and quickly, which help humans save an large amount of time. Instead of setting aside some time to do it, they can unwind after a stressful day by enjoying the music or watching a television thanks to that intelligent equipment.
This all leas me to the conclusion that tasks carrying out by robots have personally negative sides been more dominant than its beneficial factors. Thus, it is very essential for people to make use of these benefits and try to minimize the undesirable limitations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Looking at an observational perspective, Artificial Intelligence AI modifying who...
^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ans. Hence, numerous robots automated to support human in working and doing the h...
^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...ch can repair robots and surely it will takes abundant days, even a few months to ser...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ervice these gadgets. Take my uncles as an quintessential example, he used to buy ...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tly and quickly, which help humans save an large amount of time. Instead of settin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26139817629 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00771205348 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671732522796 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6220568245 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16514322343 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552014277117 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415012009605 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101999516392 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200950143963 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.