Nowadays, most large companies operate multi-nationality. To what extent those companies should have responsibility towards local communities in which they operate?
Currently, globalization is a trend. Therefore, a lot of companies open their subsidiaries in many countries. Although generating profits from new markets is the top priority for each company, they also need to have responsibilities to the host countries.
There are two main reason why multinational companies should conduct their business in a socially responsible manner. Firstly, they have to pay taxes promptly and adequately. As a result, authorities may have more revenue to spend in key fields, especially education, health and infrastructure, which leads to an improvement not only in the quality of life of the whole community but also creating some advantages for enterprises. For example, if the government have money to develop infrastructure such as upgrading public transport system or building new airports, new harbors, etc.…, companies will save time, cost to delivery and receive goods as well as materials. Accordingly, their performance are better and certainly they can earn huge profits.
Secondly, multinational corporations have to protect environment since their activities have effects on it. Without control, production processes may result in serious environment degradation, such as global warming stemming from factory emissions or the irresponsible disposal of industrial waste. If factories installed waste treatment system instead of discharging chemical waste into river, water pollution could be controlled. This will create the fresh environment for the local people as well as the companies’ workers, who contribute to the performance of company. Besides that, the firms can be fined if their activities have negative impacts on the environment. In fact, recently Formosa – a Taiwan firm was fined US 500 million dollars for discharging chemical waste into the ocean by the Vietnamese government.
In conclusion, enterprises can run their business on many countries, they have to have responsibility towards the host countries yet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72297297297 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26884601552 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652027027027 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9282533998 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0666666667 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174125139716 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564889110489 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441819931107 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115296807436 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381033951155 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.