Nowadays, not many students are choosing to study science subject in some countries. What are reasons for their choice? What will be effects on their society?
In recent years, only a minority of learners tend to study subjects related science, and this seems to be an increasingly common trend in many countries. There are numerous reasons behind this tendency, and I would argue that it has serious negative impact in society.
To begin with, the phenomenon can be attributable to two principal factors. Firstly, science is a less attractive subject than other such as art or music. As a matter of fact, it is extremely hard, dry, and simply high requests for all students. As a result, although it is not interesting, people studying science have to try a lot to get a high score. Secondly, job opportunities are also main reason for this issue. In other words, jobs related science are not diversified as well as the less of a chance to have a decent job which lead to the preference for other better subjects. Therefore, instead of choosing a challenging subject like science, they will choose alternative one which is more suitable and easier.
On the other hand, the problem of the less of teenagers learning science major can result in some harmful effects. One significant problem may be that the number of individuals working in this major would not be enough. To be more specific, because of the lack of youngsters graduated in this subject, the human resources will be deficient causing the science products do not supply sufficiently to meet the demand of social development. Another negative problem is relevant with the employment of other subjects. It means that there are a redundant manpower in other jobs when almost people focus on different majors beside science. Consequently, the percentage of unemployed people would rise obviously due to the cutthroat competition.
In conclusion, the shortage of students choosing science subject is caused by several factors, and this problem might be bring about serious impacts for modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated science are not diversified as well as the less of a chance to have a decent...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08598726115 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80380870591 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582802547771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0216738156 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1875 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207234018529 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619180205423 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463669702526 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132714481707 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260842899473 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.