Consumerism is what driving the todays generations forward, we can see the influence of advertisement on each every purchase decisions we make. People are forced to buy lot more than what they actually needed, because of the tentacles of so called modern marketing strategies. In my opinion, it is completely a negative trend.
To begin with, many of these Ad's are actually misleading the end consumers by projecting false claims and offers. As a result, consumers eventually lose there sweat money without getting the desired product. Moreover, there are lot of people in the world living under poverty without getting enough food and basic necessities, at the same time some parts of the world are wasting their money on purchasing items more than their required quantity. If they could have able control this nature, these extra resources can be used for naturing the poverty problem to some extent.
In addition, world is trying hard to deal with the ever increasing problem of waste disposal. No matter whether it is food waste or E-waste, authorities are spending such a lot of money on the effective disposal of these items. For instance, according to the recent studies most of these waste are generated as a results of person's over buying nature. On top of that, there will be over exploitation of natural resources because of this humans greed habbit, especially in the case of food items and natural resources. Such as, if we go to a supermarket, we can often see offers like if we buy a certain quantity of item, we will get a 10 or 15 percent discount on it's original price. So consumers automatically purchase that much quantity even if they don't want it.
To recapitulate, I think the people need to think twice before buying something. Whether they actually need that much product or less and also they should think about the impact of such practices as well. Such a way we can develop a sustainable buying pattern among them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...poverty without getting enough food and basic necessities, at the same time some parts of the wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...es most of these waste are generated as a results of persons over buying nature. On top o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...on of natural resources because of this humans greed habbit, especially in the case of...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... natural resources. Such as, if we go to a supermarket, we can often see offers l...
^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...urchase that much quantity even if they dont want it. To recapitulate, I think th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87951807229 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66042811896 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4110329057 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128677765882 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044973615534 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526160472526 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874386282487 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454343787996 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.