Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Do you agree/ disagree with this view?
Regardless of drastic impact derived from hands-on experience or character traits, a group of individuals argue that the academic certificate would be far more significant. Though there are a number of reasons explaining this prevailing phenomenon, I completely disagree with this opinion on any aspects.
There are a multitude of rationales to demonstrate why this foreseeable trend has occurred. First and foremost, these days, most enterprises have a tendency to aggravate a number of employees who have a higher education for any higher positions in a company such as manager or CEO. To meet this demand, a host of employers are willing to sacrifice a length of time to acquire an amount of academic knowledge and pay effort to take a multitude of certificates on academic aspects . As a result, when this phenomenon becomes ubiquitous, they are likely to pay no regards to the necessity of life experience and individual qualities to improve themselves to become the best version of them. Social status is another fact justifying the popularity of this trend. In other words, being exposed to formal academic knowledge would demonstrate their intelligence and diligence, which help them to be given respect from the public. Hence, they do not face many challenges or obstacles to trigger far-reaching achievements not only in their work but also in society.
Though some reasons cited above, I strongly hold a belief that paying much attention to academic qualifications could bring forward detrimental ramifications to their lives. Firstly, this trend would generate the shortage of life skills which are significant and essential to have a good preparation to strive harder in their lives. For example, if they are lack of communication skills with others, they could find it difficult to integrate into the discussion or any work in society. This downside is able to make them drawback and limit their communication abilities or not even mention spur them to mental diseases in case of suffering from this crippling problem for a long time. Besides that, they are able to miss promising opportunities to explore their hidden talent potentials in the community along with academic knowledge. By availing these chances, people would stand out better chances to improve their character such as being more outgoing and cordial with others, bringing them a better life.
In conclusion, while there are a number of evidence to explain this trend, I fully have a disagreement on this phenomenon because it could create a host of drawbacks to prevent the comprehensive development of a person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tude of certificates on academic aspects . As a result, when this phenomenon becom...
^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly to pay no regards to the necessity of life experience and individual qualities...
^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and limit their communication abilities or not even mention spur them to mental ...
^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much evidence', 'a good deal of evidence'.
Suggestion: much evidence; a good deal of evidence
...ife. In conclusion, while there are a number of evidence to explain this trend, I fully have a d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24460431655 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97618905463 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570743405276 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2021503715 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6875 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0625 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233459698079 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691812301648 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250508883436 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127742056678 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040469247286 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.