Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
As the world evolves, technological development has become an inextricable part of our lives. Hence, due to the ubiquitous of cutting edge technology in surveillance system – such as cell phone spy – the conversations of people on mobile phones are being observed nowadays, though people are unrealized. It seems to me that the downsides of this development surpass the upsides.
On the one hand, it is an undeniable fact that observing users through harnessing the technology of smartphones may have certain advantages. Deterring criminal wrongdoing is one of the benefits. To enumerate, when people speak on the phone to plan for perpetrating a crime, concerned authorities will most probably monitor the discussion, so that they can apprehend the true culprit behind perpetration which could lead to minimize the crime rate. Therefore, not only are streets much safer, but people also ponder twice before infringing the regulation.
On the other hand, notwithstanding the merits of this paradigm, the repercussions cannot be overlooked. Monitoring citizens deem morally wrong deed because they are watched without their permission so that this tends to be a violation of privacy. Thus, by tracking individuals’ smartphones, the liberty of the people tends to be restricted. Moreover, a surveillance camera in shops can be exploited to watch shoppers, which pose a credible threat. For instance, these shops might blackmail their clients owing to the recorded videos from closed-circuit television. This means that technological advancement such as security camera become a serious menace.
In conclusion, whilst technology has a number of benefits, of which preventing crimes is the most apparent, it has significant drawbacks, most notably is a privacy violation. In my opinion, the disadvantages of this development transcend the advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61130742049 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28832714786 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2530594532 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255249838289 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700611134066 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530633766206 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131604069948 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668784325139 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.