Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Recent technology allows some proffesionals to literally have a look into people's lives - oversee their actions and verbal expression. The main problem arises when people are not aware of this possibility of disturbing their privacy. I strongly believe that despite the general positive outlook on this issue, the disadvantages still outweight the advantages.
No one can deny that smart applications on high-tech gadgets can be useful when it comes to tracking people or lost personal belongings. To illustrate that, let's consider someone has lost a mobile phone with some important data and he or she wants it back. Here comes the laptop programme called 'Track me', where you register your phone and after clicking on 'search', it gives you the exact location, even when your phone is dead. Furthermore, this smaller steps in developing the tracking system can lead to bigger steps in terms of tracking people who have become victims of any sort of crime. Monitoring the actions of particular people also lead to reducing commiting a crime in the base.
However, constant surveillance on innocent people is not a good outlook in the long run. Cyberbullying is a still-increasing problem and with additional initiative from surroundings, it could encourage hackers to do even more of a dirty work. As regards my personal further prediction, with development of the monitoring system, we will not have any privacy nor censorship.
Generally speaking, everybody just cannot know everything. Although there is a large number of benefits and some particular everyday issues which monitoring people could solve, I believe that in the long term, this manipulation with people could get out of our hands and result in tremendous global catastrophe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
...hen it comes to tracking people or lost personal belongings. To illustrate that, lets consider some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nnot know everything. Although there is a large number of benefits and some particular everyday i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, so, still, as regards, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28776978417 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9285237902 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643884892086 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9825024607 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213003085214 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641587272935 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395353066229 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112668432138 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242052046537 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.