Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? (08/2019)
Over the past few years, the acceleration of breakthrough technology has triggered far-reaching changes in people’s communication method. There are a plethora of measures in this trend have influenced our impersonal relationships, I concur with the idea that this influence could bring numerous positive outcomes.
It is undeniable to claim that the technology is likely to be subject in many aspects of our lives. The first effect is to allow the number of citizens having a desire to communicate with each other by clicking on a mouse or touching on a screen. Secondly, the goods consumption of residents is transformed by the advent of cutting-edge technology in various ways. For instance, instead of hanging out to purchase essential things, online shopping is known for the most alternative solution possessing a host of items, clothes and the like more efficient and faster or saving their precious time which should be applied for another aspect.
On the other hand, to enhance the quality of people's communication, the employment of breakthrough devices could bring forward beneficial ramifications. First and foremost, job-holders or lucrative enterprises are unlikely to find their interactions onerous in terms of contracts, conferences, incomes, among others. In fact, they do not have the attempt to meet each other to discuss their works addressed via availing telephones, laptops to have face-to-face communication without encountering directly as the conventional method. Secondly, in the aspect of education, there are a host of online services supporting teachers and students in conducting numerous E-learning courses. Taking the pandemic of Co-vid 19 as a shining example, online learning is considered as one of the optimal ways for learners to accumulate academic knowledge effectively. This not only makes a contribution to generating the safest learning environment but also join hands with the authorities and governments to flattening the curb of death casualties based on implementing their solutions, particularly in minimizing the movement.
In conclusion, as cited above, while people's communication is considerably impacted by the stride of technology, I strongly hold a belief that this development would cater to our lives with full of practical results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
... or touching on a screen. Secondly, the goods consumption of residents is transformed...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...in the aspect of education, there are a host of online services supporting teachers ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly impacted by the stride of technology, I strongly hold a belief that this devel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59025787966 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26664152799 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621776504298 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4143775867 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.076923077 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195225333012 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600023960377 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386215691955 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110710927813 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271439175366 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.