Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In the modern word, technology is one of the most vital sector of everyday lives. Indeed, it almost impacts most part of persoal relationships. Although it seems so useful, it does not correspond by means of communication. This essay will investigate some negative aspects of this issue.
As far as human beings do not want to end up alone, being in a right relationship is one of the major requirements for them. Therefore, they are willing to contact with people around even whoever they have just met in social networks. So, they start to communicate with those people they do not know at all. At the first glance, it seems adventurous. But, on the next steps it become heartbroken as they emotionally attach to wrong people which will bring up so much psychological problems in future.
On the other hand, communications are fascilated by technology improvements; since, there is a lots of applications help people talk to their loved ones which considerably are affordable and easily accessible. To be precise, distances become meaningless which is a serious threaten to relationships. Because, when two people have an argue around a specific subject over and over, they could not propose the resolution through computer or mobile phone screens and the problem should have solved by the face to face communication. Therefore, not only the relations become harder but also it gets more mechanical.
In conclusion, by the shallow perspectiveو technology is the greatest improvement happenig to the new word; but, when we look deeper it just falling our relationships apart and unconsciously, it lets some strangers come to our lives. Hence, it persuade us to blieve that we are not alone but in reality we are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
... adventurous. But, on the next steps it become heartbroken as they emotionally attach ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...bring up so much psychological problems in future. On the other hand, communications a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are a lots'?
Suggestion: there are a lots
...ated by technology improvements; since, there is a lots of applications help people talk to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...echnology improvements; since, there is a lots of applications help people talk to the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their loved ones which considerably are affordable and easily accessible. To be ...
^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ionships. Because, when two people have an argue around a specific subject over and over...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'persuades'?
Suggestion: persuades
... strangers come to our lives. Hence, it persuade us to blieve that we are not alone but ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07042253521 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05107614811 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9657827528 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142335628201 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411646584265 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340918203012 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738720584636 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285003195914 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.