nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology
In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
The way people interact with each other has been evolved during the time. Technology improvements play an important role in accelerating this process of change. Technology has reshaped human relationships negatively and positively.
On the positive side, accessibility has been improved by means of technology. People can easily make a phone call with anybody they want all over the world. Parents for example, can be informed about their children by pushing only one button. People keep in touch with their favorite friends regardless of how far they are from each other. Moreover, technology provides some platforms which help people find their old friends and kinships. Facebook, for instance, lets people seek their old friends and even connects unfamiliar people who have something in common.
On the minus side, people could be disturbed by any notification and could barely focus on their jobs. Given that, People are not able to concentrate on their work until they get disconnected and isolated. In fact, based on scientific achievements each notification which pops up can retard your performance up to 20 minutes. Technology, also, needs some apparatuses which keep people connected to each other. With this in mind, these days, homes are fully equipped by technology which beside how much they charge residents, they fill their free time and deprive them from communicating with others. Children, for example, despite playing with peers, they play video games by themselves. It means, they do not have enough chance to practice communicating and be socialized.
In conclusion, although technology has significant impacts on people’s relationships, it should be managed to strengthen its benefits. Technology should be treated as a tool for expanding our network, not a goal which narrows the friend zone.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86820161186 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628070175439 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8625373513 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276817492782 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905447062232 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728040205338 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193968809493 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994557845499 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.