Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There is a great impact on people because of the advanced technology. The development has changed the way we communicate with each other, and I believe that this has a positive influence on the society.
The most significant advantage of temporal technology is the convenience. People had to write the letter or even try to visit others when they wanted to interact with them. That would waste time and labor. By the Internet, the interaction could be easier. It is my experience that when I was young, I had to wait for a long time to receive the letter from my friends who transferred to other schools. However, we now could write to each other by e-mail. The social applications such as Line, Facebook message, and WeChat also improve the possibility of interaction. These furthermore affect the effectiveness of the jobs. There is no need to take extra time to wait for the forms from managers and you can finish the works as soon as possible.
The other influence is on our cell phone. From the housing phone to the cell phone, people nowadays have the freedom to talk to each other anytime even they are separated. Moreover, with the invention of video chat, users can see each other when they are talking. There are numerous families have to separate for working and studying; the innovation has considerably solved the troubles with distance.
In conclusion, by the development of technology, the interaction among people has improved and become more convenient. Without the barrier of time and distance, our relations could be closer than ever.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92045454545 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.744743599 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57196969697 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6197721229 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4117647059 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274454549207 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777102167905 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766453282271 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18321545414 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982248818816 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.