In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
There is a debate concerning public transportation. Numerous people consider that spending large amounts of money on developing new rapid railway lines within the cities is important. Others, however, believe that public funding ought to be used for the improvement of the existing mass transportation. This essay will address both sides of views and provide an opinion in conclusion.
On the one hand, allocating large amounts of public money to develop new rapid railway lines is essential since many cities around the globe are not well-connected. City dwellers use their vehicles to commute around the cities as the current transport system is not effective and efficient. Consequently, more and more cars are used in the cities, increasing traffic congestion and traffic accidents. On that account, having a well-established fast transport system connecting all areas around the cities is essential in addressing public transportation issues.
On the other hand, the opponents of this idea consider that the money should be used for improving the existing mass transport because what is currently needed is not a new rapid railway system, but much more modern city transportation. The governments can improve the transportation facilities, such as adding new busses or adding new bus routes which are able to cover all areas around the cities. This way, the government can provide a better transportation system without having to spend a great deal of public funding.
To sum up, although improving the current public transportation system sounds appealing and may be cheaper than constructing a rapid transportation system, I firmly believe that using the money for the development of rapid railway lines is well-spent as it not only links the areas around the cities, it also provides a solution for the current city transportation problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o spend a great deal of public funding. To sum up, although improving the curren...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38620689655 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08570406229 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513793103448 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0508518936 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343739580742 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126396444082 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086757203516 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228554447698 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453734630828 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.