Budget spending on transportation is one of the controversial subjects among people. Although some of them believe that fast transit could be fasciliated by building up new railways, some other consider the whole society and think public transport should be ameliorated. However, my opinion is rather close to the second groups, this essay will discuss both views.
Time and energy is two indispensable parts of life. Because, both are required for daily activities to be more efficient. Indeed, the less time people stuck in transportation, the more energy they will have in rest of day. For instance, if a person does not need to wake up early to be on time, ofcourse she will be more energetic in her job which leads to greater efficiency; therefore, constructing high speed railways could be a big concern that should be considered.
The beauty of human right is shown up when everyone could access to all facilities. Actually, This means justice. To be precise, if government spends the income on public transportations, not only it is kind of eco friendly, but also it will be accessible by all members of society. For example, there are some people seriously suffer from heart disease who could not afford a private ride and also could not be in crowded area such as bus and subway in their current position. So, by improving such facilities everyone could use them happily.
In conclusion, governments ought to spend the budget in a way which is beneficial for all member of community. As a result, this is not occure by just building up new high speed railways; while, happen by ameliorating current public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93357933579 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92203395442 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608856088561 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8888426119 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198294268757 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578182032583 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596106867975 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117289648793 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483963434116 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.