One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people consider increasing the fuel price to be one of the best methods to solve environmental issues; however; I disagree entirely about that because of its short-term effectiveness and impossibility.
To begin with, imposing a new higher cost for fuel will cut down the exhaust emission from the private vehicle as people can’t keep up with the demand for fuel expenses, leading to a smaller amount of vehicles, but while this is almost or barely affect the higher class- who don’t have to worry much about money. In addition, an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental problems. In fact, causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals in both agriculture and industry which contaminate both water, land, and many more sources.
Besides the disadvantages of high-cost fuel could make above, I believe that there are other sustainable measures to solve the problem. Firstly, consumer behavior has to change; using items made from recyclable materials such as wood or paper,... instead of plastic. Moreover, not only do our behaviors need to change but also our mindset; to do this information about environmental problems should be put into the curriculum, and syllabus; school should become the place for the next generations learns about environmental issues. And while emissions from fossil fuels only account for some part of the world's pollution, it is the lack of awareness of environmental problems that is the leaven cause.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles is not one of the best ways to solve an environmental problem. In fact, changing consumers’ behavior and perspectives are among the best methods in reducing human impact on the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...cyclable materials such as wood or paper,... instead of plastic. Moreover, not onl...
^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...fuels only account for some part of the worlds pollution, it is the lack of awareness ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16013071895 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88844708715 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2158488304 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.545454545 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0909090909 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37913223815 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131791182768 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134134971801 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240894345443 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108015933516 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.