in order to improve the quality of education, high school students should be encouraged to evaluate and criticise their teachers, but others think that it will result in loss of respect and discipline in classroom. what is your opinion?
When it comes to inviting the input of students and seeking their comments on their teachers' performance, there are divergent views. Many people object to this practise, saying that it will be at the expense of respect and discipline. From my point of view, students' participation in teacher appraisal is definitely helpful, but it should be administrated properly.
A strong argument for using students rating to evaluate teachers is that students' judgement is reliable and impartial. because of their ongoing interation with teachers throughout the semester, students have the authority to measure the performance and competence of their teachers. it will be reflected on the knowledge they have obtained from learning and the stance they have adopted toward subjects taught. As a result, teachers can enhance their competence and adjust teaching aims and methods for attainment of students' learning objective. in addition, it is an irrefutable that students are in a advantaged position to meditate deeply on teachers' teaching practice and commitment. only by collecting students' feedback on some observable facts such as the punctuality and the legibility of his or her writing can the school assess their performance. This, thus, help to improve the standard of teaching and learning in schools.
Despite these overt advantages of encouraging students' input, it might negative affect the position of teachers. In other words, this practice many incite the feeling of powerlessness and being disrespected, which may, in turn, impede their performance. Besides, there are numerous students who are mischievous and disobedient would provide misinterpretations, leaving teachers an inaccurate picture of their strengths and weaknesses. This, hence, leads them into a poor judgement about what can do to satisfy the needs of their students.
As discussed above, students' judgements provide an important source of data for evaluating teachers, helping them to discover their disadvantages and improve their performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nts rating to evaluate teachers is that students judgement is reliable and impartial. be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ts judgement is reliable and impartial. because of their ongoing interation with teache...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...mance and competence of their teachers. it will be reflected on the knowledge they...
^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ainment of students learning objective. in addition, it is an irrefutable that stu...
^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... is an irrefutable that students are in a advantaged position to meditate deeply ...
^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...chers teaching practice and commitment. only by collecting students feedback on some...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, may, so, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64918032787 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07105497535 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2814426789 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.866666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235994213059 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789901502226 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298582463846 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15012047343 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00642990783866 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.