In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car and use the money to improve pubic transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such solution?
Recently, traffic has been a prevalent problem to most societies. Therefore, taxing private automobile owners and using the money for public vehicles are the solutions. While many claim that this would bring several positive elements to the table, this issue has also attracted criticism from others. This essay will attempt to indicate the advantages as well as disadvantages.
On a positive note, it can be recognized that there are several advantages. Firstly, one major benefit is that the high level of traffic congestion could be plausibly mitigated. This is because the drivers cannot be able to afford the accelerating fees, so that they might not desire to buy cars. As a result, such exhaust fumes released daily by vehicles will be reduced and that provoke a better environment. In addition, another leverage that investing money in transportation offers more advances to the system. This could provide new means of transport for the public which have superior function such as making trips with longer distance and high velocity, therefore; people could save time traveling.
Moving on to the negative side of this doing, drawbacks can also be identified. To start with, one negative aspect of imposing more taxes is it is at the expense of drivers. The example for this can be found in the reality that they have to deal with a plethora of bills involved in driving such as car, pollution. Moreover, individuals could feasibly face undesirable destinations. In Vietnam, for example, if someone dwelling in the centre of Ho Chi Minh city want to go to the outskirt of it by bus, he/she have to take from 3 to 4 trips of different buses.
All in all, it is clear that putting more taxes on car owners and using the money for transportations includes a wide range of both positive and negative elements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'many claims'.
Suggestion: many claims
...ublic vehicles are the solutions. While many claim that this would bring several positive ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'dwells'.
Suggestion: dwells
...ns. In Vietnam, for example, if someone dwelling in the centre of Ho Chi Minh city want ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...go to the outskirt of it by bus, he/she have to take from 3 to 4 trips of different ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99016393443 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74358649649 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603278688525 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8173550602 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11251299276 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367304008622 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437816607736 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779305316063 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342996549975 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.