In the past older generation was source of knowledge and experience. What in modern world they have little knowledge and youngster have idea more than older one. Is it positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

In the past older generation was source of knowledge and experience. What in modern world they have little knowledge and youngster have idea more than older one. Is it positive or negative development?

In this modern age youth empowerment is prevailing in our society. In the past, older generation was source of knowledge and experience. Unlike the past, nowadays yongester are benchmark of our community. This essay will articulate it as a positive development in upcoming paragraphs.

The fact can't be denied that breakthrough of sophisticated technology made yongester modern thinker and they cast of their predecessor conventional thinking. For instance, in the past women were slave of four walls of House, now rubbing shoulders with men. This has happened only because of new thinking of yongester. Thus, yongester era not only benift families but also whole globe.

On the other hand, yongester new ideas act as a elixir for older. To put it into further details, in the past old generation had to do strenuous effort which are now done by yongester in seconds. For example paying of bill on phone instead of standing in que. Therefore, yongester provide comfortable life to old generation.

In conclusion, Although in past old generation was sea of knowledge, modern era is of youth. This new trend is prosperous for both generations.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt in upcoming paragraphs. The fact cant be denied that breakthrough of sophisti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... other hand, yongester new ideas act as a elixir for older. To put it into furthe...
^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e instead of standing in que. Therefore, yongester provide comfortable life to ol...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 1615.20841683 60% => OK
No of words: 186.0 315.596192385 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22043010753 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96951890856 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6822849401 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.3571428571 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2857142857 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186398526946 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707417613581 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124716343659 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116064498435 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839022123015 0.056905535591 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.