In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?
These days, the demand for shopping has been drawing a public attention. The question of whether shopping could be considered as an interest or not is a controversial issue. I do not completely agree with this point of view.
There are several reasons to explain why many hold a belief that shopping could bring many assets deliberated kind of a hobby. First and Foremost, the consumerism makes a contribution to addressing the number of onerous problems in the economic activities. To be more specific, this work may spur an inevitable measure of declining the rate of unemployment which is always a thorny issue for the economy nowadays. Secondly, the shopping plays a dominant role in entertaining for the residents after long working hours in the sense that leading to helping workers or students get their mojo back or get a deeper insight into the most wonderful moment in their life.
Despite these attractions, there are still having some drawbacks for this trend. If people set aside the enormous spending for shopping, they will be thrown in disarray. For instance, it is when their budgets have to focus on shopping, which easily plunges into the mire of debt or even brinks their job to the brink of being out of work. As a sad truth, the social phenomenon of impulse buying would take their toll on the environment. The reason is that their overconsumption on shopping is excessive, which generates the so-called “throw-away” problem. By taking this action, this influences on many corners of the environment such as exhausting natural resources, especially non-degradable materials.
To sum up, the trend of shopping also caters to people with many advantages but its balance should be implemented to limit all the detrimental consequences mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...ng has been drawing a public attention. The question of whether shopping could be considered as an inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...here are several reasons to explain why many hold a belief that shopping could bring many...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ing could bring many assets deliberated kind of a hobby. First and Foremost, the consumer...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13058419244 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95189203461 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646048109966 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5922146622 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136011223284 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477731904021 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379480553873 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893766655631 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171775182925 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.