People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
It is firmly true that the use of soft drinks that contain a high level of sugar is growing up rapidly, even in developing countries and less developed nations. While a number of factors explains this trend, there are some measures that have been applying to reduce the intake of the sugar-based drinks.
Social media and heavy marketing campaigns are the principal reasons causing the issue. This gives rise lots of concerns about life-threatening health conditions such as diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases and certain types of cancer that is of concern to World Health Organization. To be specific, sugar-added drinks manufacturing enterprises intend to advertise their products to target audience of young children and adolescents. This encourages them to be are likely to ask their parents to purchase those drinks for them. Given their consumption of high level of sugar content, they are prone to sugar-relating diseases. Consequently, they put themselves on weight and high sugar of blood.
There are three solutions should be implemented to address and reduce the effects of those drinks to youngsters. Firstly, local authorities should impose some rules concern of taxes on sugar-based drinks manufacture. These laws are supposed to target to the companies that produce those drinks and do not allow them to add the taxes into the selling price of products. Secondly, the board management of public areas should cut down on number of vending machines located around the areas. Finally, media bodies should carry out TV programs and health awareness campaigns on TV, on the Internet and in the public that could help in combatting the promotion of soft drinks by marketing agencies, including the compulsory addition of health warning on labels, as in the case of cigarettes.
In conclusion, although marketing campaigns are making the increase of sales of sugar-added drinks, effective steps have taken to slow down this trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33656957929 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87821097333 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585760517799 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8286372276 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.785714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19955950838 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697657276401 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518700810972 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108851173766 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474620292428 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.