Along with facilities citizens are granted in daily life such as hot water, internet, heating system and so on residing in cities have a number of drawbacks to encounter. I think the latter causes can make citizens to migrate to rural areas.
It goes without saying that living in cities is not a plain sailing due to the following reasons. Firstly, residence in a city means you have to cover more rental payments than living in suburbs for instance. Citizens have hot water, timely heating systems, fail-safe electricity cut-outs and most importantly the internet living without which nowadays even elderly cannot image. However, it by no means they will be citizens’ property for the rest of their live meaning they have to pay to benefit from them, and if you do not, you will be deprived of them which can look a suffer for city dwellers. What is more, I think if you pile up a huge rental debt, you may be exiled from your house at least temporarily. Meanwhile, to pay monthly rental fees one has to have a high paying job which is challenging to get by in cities, this being a second problem. These days to enjoy living in bigger cities like Moscow or Rome one should have a job salary which could help afford aforementioned. To do this they have to be at least good specialists at their field or to have a degree so as to have a well-paid job. Unless, one does not meet these criteria cannot have a good job and to pay all fees relating to city residence like transportation as an example.
Speaking about moving to regional town, this option looks suitable for citizens and I think government should consider popularizing this among the citizens with the next ways. Firstly, government can launch television advertisements that encourage brighter sides of living in regions. This method can have little effect without implementing real projects. Government have to make citizens believe they will benefit from living in rural areas by improving life there. This can be done by creating more thriving prospects for potential region residents in the form of better jobs and lower prices there.
All in all, I think living in cities looks sensible despite real problems there, government can interest latter ones to move to rural areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'watered'.
Suggestion: watered
...suburbs for instance. Citizens have hot water, timely heating systems, fail-safe elec...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...will be deprived of them which can look a suffer for city dwellers. What is more, I thin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 809, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
... a high paying job which is challenging to get by in cities, this being a second probl...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1080, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ists at their field or to have a degree so as to have a well-paid job. Unless, one does...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence like transportation as an example. Speaking about moving to regional town, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... implementing real projects. Government have to make citizens believe they will bene...
^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est latter ones to move to rural areas.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, so, well, while, as to, at least, for instance, i think, speaking about, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81395348837 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57971741552 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.734182277 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.588235294 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20484255906 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701665631775 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396126306461 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127937254856 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407007681903 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.