Public museum and art will not be needed because people can use Internet to see the historical objects. Do you agree?
In the threshold of the new era, Internet allows us human to access to super highway information which consists of historical objects or art masterpieces. Therefore, whether museums and art galleries should be replaced is a highly debated issue. My view is that by no mean these building will be knocked-down due to its plus advantages.
It is irrefutable that visiting real artistic projects like museums or galleries is a truly rewarding hand-on experience. In this regard, in order to understand a certain place, these destinations would be ideal to gain culture and tradition. For instance, the majority of tourists coming to new place often put national museum or well-known heritages first priority. Thus, they might broaden their horizon of knowledge in the new lands.
Furthermore, no matter how vivid and real computer’s images are, they would never replace the uniqueness of museums and works of art. That is to say, the touch of fingertips is more highly appreciated than passive watching through the screen. To illustrate, if the Vietnamese National Museum were clear to make way for landmarks or building, the next generation would be limited from seeing the dynamic of historical objects for real. As a result, they could merely see these artificial ones without any sensation. That is why the idea of remaining unique historical museums and art galleries should be strictly followed up.
Despite its obvious positive effects, keeping too many historical buildings may probably pose threats to a country. Particularly, some buildings are out-of-dated, which easily to fall down anytime. It, therefore, triggers serious consequences, even deaths. Obviously, there is reason why people against having historical and artistic works in town.
In conclusion, it can be said that historical places and artistic projects still play crucial roles on preserving a nation culture. It is undeniably represented for cultural identity which is needed to preserve. By doing so, we firmly sure that the uniqueness of countries will be inherited to the next generation. .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... historical and artistic works in town. In conclusion, it can be said that histo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ll be inherited to the next generation. .
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38532110092 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96455457097 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642201834862 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1682948503 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6842105263 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236979767036 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603917387849 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467529280574 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120038665525 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542948992108 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.