in recent years, farming practice has changed to include methods such as factory farming and the use of technology to improve crops. Some people believe that these development are neccessary, which others regard them as ddangerous and advocate a return to more traditional farming methods. Discuss both point of view and give your own opinion.
There has been heated debate about the innovation of farming method. While it is posible to claim that applying scienticfic approaches and advanced technology to produce food brings a lot of benefits for humanbeings, I personally beliee that these advancements have caused several negative effects and the conventional farming approaches should be maintained and developed.
On the one hand there are several reason why the advancement of technology in agriculture can be positive. Firstly, technology hase been researched and developed to create new breed of plants and animals. These new breeds have shorter duration, good endurance, and higher productivity which not only brings farmers moer profit but also meet food demand when population of the world is on the rapid rise. It also can be ardued that using technology such as factory farming and growing vegatable in green house help to reduce the loss when epidemic diseases or bad weather happens. For example, when storms of typhoons occurs, plant will be fallen down by strong winds or floods causing crop failure if they are grown outside.
On the other hand, thw application of technology in farming and food proceseing triggers may negative consequences. Initially, it is claimed that overuse of pesticides and other chemicals contaminate both food and environment. Food containing many toxic elements and enviroment polluted because a large number of chemical substances have not been decomposed will pose serious threats to human health. Secondly, breeding programes have been generates a wide range of genetically modified product (GMP). If people consume these products, they will become victims of genetic mutations and suffer strange diseases due to the fact that most of them have not been practically tested on the safety for humanbeings.
In conclusion, farming advancement provides us with benefits and also risks. I tend to think that these development are essential in the long-term, however, people have to pay attention to the threats of new farming methods. Furthermore, there should be an extensive research that will focus on improving traditional agriculture to increase productivity and also quality of food. Due to the fact that using conventional approaches in farming is always the best way to produce fresh and nutritious products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...lements and enviroment polluted because a large number of chemical substances have not been decom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this development' or 'these developments'?
Suggestion: this development; these developments
...ts and also risks. I tend to think that these development are essential in the long-term, however...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'extensive research'.
Suggestion: extensive research
...g methods. Furthermore, there should be an extensive research that will focus on improving traditiona...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cus on improving traditional agriculture to increase productivity and also qualit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42541436464 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87869692819 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.367203991 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188730129975 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625398882951 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463936020113 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116048730706 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215768714138 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.