Nowadays, it is widely argued whether rich and financially developed countries can help developing countries by simply loaning them money, or if this course of action is insufficient and can not tackle poverty alone. Speaking for myself, I absolutely agree that monetary policies in favor of poor countries are not enough for the reasons that I explain below.
First of all, financial assistance provided by rich countries or the World Bank in the form of long-term loans is not enough to face poverty. That is because poor countries have a structural problem, namely, they consume much more money, physical resources, and goods than they produce. In order for things to change regarding the financial state of a country, long-standing investments are required. For example, Greece in 2010 was declared bankrupt. Immediately, it was granted a multibillion loan by the European Union to take care of its interim expenses, but at the same time, Germany and France invested at Athens International Airport and Piraeus port respectively. These two investments helped two of the biggest financial centers of Athens to remain financially stable for the years to come.
In addition, money is required to buy goods and satisfy people's basic needs. However, in developing countries, such as South Africa or Cameroon, poverty is associated with a hygiene crisis and remarkably high percentages of deaths due to illnesses. People in these countries and their local governments are in desperate need of medical and pharmaceutical equipment. Also, volunteers, especially doctors, are required to offer their service to people who are in desperate need.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the above-mentioned statement and consider long-standing investments and pharmaceutical and medical donations just as important in regard to solving poverty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...inancially developed countries can help developing countries by simply loaning them money,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4701754386 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06524114766 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617543859649 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4664222203 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.923076923 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241641362655 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739879452998 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763431215731 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135332157443 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973641020635 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.