Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations should find other ways to help alleviate the economic situation in poor countries since financial assistance does not work. From my personal perspective, I totally agree with this opinion for the two following reasons.

The main reason why finanicial aid from developed nations could not solve poverty is due to corruption in aid management. This means that since poor countries are often less democratic and more authoritarian, their corrupted officials will take a major portion of the foreign financial aid before trickling it down to the citizens. Therefore, people who are really in need will benefit nearly nothing from the aid and continue living below the poverty line. To illustrate, in 2020, when Vietnam sent a two-million dollar donation to combat starvation and impoverishment in North Korea, the local authorities pocketed most of the money, leaving the financially struggling people in the nation to survive on their own.

Another rationale for my concurrence is that monetary assistance fails to address the roots of the poverty problem which are economic mismanagement and unstable political systems. To be more specific, I believe that without actually providing any means for them to earn more income, helping destitute people by giving them more money can only solve their financial hardships for a short term, and eventually the situation remain unchanged. On the other hand, a sound economic approach and a more stable government would surely create a favorable environment for every citizen to do long-term business, and as a result, the population will be lifted out of the poverty circle.

In conclusion, I believe that poor nations should stop receiving financial aid. The arguments are that the recipients of the assistance are often rampant with corruption and the aid itself cannot tackle the actual causes of the problem. Therefore, other types of support should be given to these countries.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ney, leaving the financially struggling people in the nation to survive on their own. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re stable government would surely create a favorable environment for every citize...
^^
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be lifted out of the poverty circle. In conclusion, I believe that poor natio...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, really, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31511254019 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79831822318 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4909015977 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244606321618 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825826552119 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665799199575 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143318490578 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466264294295 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.