Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It argued that wealthy nations should find other ways to help alleviate impoverishment in low-income countries since financial assistance does not work. From my personal perspective, I totally agree with this opinion for the following reasons.
The main reason why financial aid from developed nations could not tackle poverty is due to corruption in aid management. To be more specific, governments of poor nations are often less transparent and rampant with abuse of power, corrupted authorities tend to take a major portion of the foreign financial aid before trickling it down to the citizens. Therefore, needy people will hardly benefit from the aid and continue living below the poverty line. Another reason for my concurrence is that monetary assistance might harm the recipients’ economy. This is because while low-income countries usually have no sound economic systems, a sudden influx of money to the citizens from foreign aid could cause rising demand for goods and services, their prices tend to increase, as a consequence, inflation would surely occur, which could destroy the economy.
I argue that wealthy nations could seek other approaches to address the poverty problem in poorer nations. The first one is that economic experts could be sent to those countries to help jointly build better economic policies with the existing governments. This would create a favorable environment for every citizen to do long-term business, and as a result, the population will be lifted out of the poverty circle. Another type of help is that rich nations should invest more on needy ones. The reason is that increased foreign investment would create more jobs for their financially struggling population, which allows them to earn more stable and higher income in order to escape from poverty.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that affluent nations should stop sending donations to other least-developed states due to corruption in aid distribution and its potential harm to the economy. On the other hand, these nations could send more experts to establish stronger economic systems and increase their investment on low-income economies to actually improve their situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the recipients’ economy. This is because while low-income countries usually have ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41812865497 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77643704178 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56432748538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4210958906 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.357142857 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191615494925 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670189079069 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508955239572 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122442689956 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412911742387 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.