Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. Do you agree or disagree.
Labour immigration to wealthy economies has been capturing significant public controversy in recent decades due to the significant ramifications on developing nations’ human resources. Given the suggestion suppressing rich states’ employment of experienced workers from poorer nations, I disagree
It is true that workers’ migration is beneficial to the exporting countries. From the economic perspective, expatriates from developing nations contribute to the economic growth and living standard improvements by virtue of remittances. For example, in Haiti, remittances ensure families in poverty-stricken localities stable flow of income for the purchase of basic essentials, investments activities, lifting many individuals from the perpetual cycle of poverty. From the political viewpoint, if developing nations export experienced workers to wealthier economies with more democratic political systems, liberal values and democracy would be fostered in the sending nations. Because migrant workers would be constantly exposed to democratic values including respected human rights, freedom of expression and transparent governments, such individuals shall become more critical of their home government's performance on the issues covered in the media and less trusting in official discourse, requiring for more government accountability and better political reforms.
Labour migration could simultaneously bestow many positive impacts on the expatriates themselves. First, As developed nations offer favorable working environments, inclusive of advanced occupational training courses, state-of-the art infrastructure, sufficient funding programs and even migrant workers’ protection regulations, expatriates could be outfitted with in-depth expertise for various occupational specifications with promising career prospects. In contrast, in workers’ home nations as limited resources stemming from budget deficit are to be invested in workforce education, workers’ professional competence is merely average or even unqualified in comparison with counterparts’ in developed nations. In addition, if expatriates choose to work in foreign countries, this could mean that such people seek for liberty from the rigid regulations and harsh social norms restricting their human rights. For instance, many homosexual individuals in Russia have a propensity to work in other European countries since sodomy means capital punishment.
In conclusion, I disagree that rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need the workers more. The employment of expatriates from less developed nations could profit both workers and such countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1055, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s since sodomy means capital punishment. In conclusion, I disagree that rich coun...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d profit both workers and such countries
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.42148760331 5.12529762239 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28942462111 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611570247934 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.5513656096 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.25 106.682146367 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293739162796 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108795755983 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160859916191 0.0667982634062 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249235320878 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.269640968821 0.056905535591 474% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.9 13.0946893788 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.65 50.2224549098 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.55 12.4159519038 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.74 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 78.4519038076 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 10.7795591182 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.