For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Teachers’ and parents’ effects on youngsters’ intellectual and social developments have been capturing significant public attention in recent decades. Although teachers’ ramifications could be pronounced, those of parents cannot be ignored.
On the one hand, students’ intellectual and social successes could be attributed to teachers. From the intellectual perspective, teachers offer many serviceable and empirical methodologies compatible with each young individual’s cognitive capacity. This could act as a contributor to the betterment of lesson comprehension, feeding into their increased academic attainments. From the social perspective, teachers have a penchant for creating teamwork opportunities and extracurricular activities. Consequently, these practices could cultivate the interaction and bonding among class members, preventing the social inhibition and antisocial mentality in students.
On the other hand, parents hold true significance in students’ social and intellectual developments. First, parents are the ones pouring disbursements, enabling children’ educational institution admissions, culminating in their exposure to formal academic environments, leading to their intellectual advancements. In addition, since parents’s everyday activities could notably affect children’s psychology and mentality, they should become moral example for children to follow suit. For instance, young individuals raised in families with marital stability and open mindsets are less likely to have mental impairments with higher social openness and acceptance than those with wretched adolescence in unstable families.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the suggestion prioritizing teachers’ importance over parents in terms of youngsters’ intelligence and social developments. The combination of these two influences could be the key to opening children’s potential and competence in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, those of parents cannot be ignored. On the one hand, students' intellec...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.82677165354 5.12529762239 133% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.80879416795 2.80592935109 136% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6756031075 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.384615385 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185855182823 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068580686743 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425570850304 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116372882601 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307545262639 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 9.89 50.2224549098 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 22.33 12.4159519038 180% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.