Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While some people support scientific research to be conducted by the government due to financial sustainability and moral issues, I personally believe that the cooperation between enterprises and the government could better serve the purpose.
People believe the government is responsible for this activity for many reasons. First of all, the government may enjoy a stronger financial ability, which allow them to easily invest more money to organize and carry out research activities. Therefore, the research can be conducted in a large scale and long term, which in turn provides a much more precise result afterwards. Secondly, moral issues can be prevented as the government may not let the research serve for malicious purposes. For example, the project of genetic replication has received lots of controversy, and is currently under the control of the government. This can help the government minimize unexpected impacts on the society, however, it might also prevent them from spreading the results widely.
On the other hand, private companies can contribute to those research together with the government to generate a better achievement. The first reason is that enterprises can commercialize scientific results to the public. Companies usually come up with useful customers' insights and appropriate strategies to facilitate the launch of those results. As a consequence, the research can generate economic gains effectively. Furthermore, the government can not specialize in all aspects of scientific research, and thus those can be driven better by enterprises instead. Without such collaboration, the government can be easily snowed under massive work and ineffective communication.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the cooperation of both the officials and private companies for scientific research can bring more values and benefits for the whole society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...spects of scientific research, and thus those can be driven better by enterprises instead...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66784452297 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10493555568 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9497391201 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216731186471 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788538924011 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415986602691 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136093963161 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142481652354 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.