should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? or is it the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Nowadays, a development of international economic impulses the exchange of goods among countries, so it makes the wealthy nation more and more rich and prosperous. But in fact, in the world, they are a lot of nation where penniless dominate, hungry and thirsty to ruthlessly. For this reason, the support of rich country such like proving food and education are essential to help them to overcome their unfortunate.
Some people state that the reinforcement of prosperous nation is necessary for an impoverished country to improve people’s living standard and boots economics development; other believe that is the responsibility of the government of a poorer nation to look after their citizens. I mainly agree with the former for the following reasons.
It is evident that we live in the civilisation world where we intensify humanity, sympathise and really to help people when they in the hard situation. This is because when a nation tries to share their education, equipment, finance to support the poorer country to keep pace with the grow of the world. From that, they can stand own by own and increase per capita income create for many families the option ling in a rural area as long as working in a city. For example, the Unite American invest in Vietnam, so they help us to enhance their education, infrastructure and liability for social.
In conclusion, we live in the epoch in which always progression and mobilization; but we need emphatic to give and receive more than we think. This work shows generosity and lenient of a powers nation and to chance their contemplation that the wealthy country exploits and domineer other countries whose weaker than them
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun nation seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of nations'.
Suggestion: a lot of nations
...us. But in fact, in the world, they are a lot of nation where penniless dominate, hungry and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rt the poorer country to keep pace with the grow of the world. From that, they can stand...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...ome create for many families the option ling in a rural area as long as working in a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...long as working in a city. For example, the Unite American invest in Vietnam, so they hel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'powers'' or 'power's'?
Suggestion: powers'; power's
... work shows generosity and lenient of a powers nation and to chance their contemplatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, really, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05395683453 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89307268695 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575539568345 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7284709879 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.727272727 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249435561003 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861171991953 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858378844156 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152527503273 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619629904691 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.