Society is based on rules and laws. If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do, it could not function. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Rules and laws exist in every country all over the world. Some people consider if inhabitants were free to do whatever they desire to do, it could not function. However, I completely disagree with this statement and express my notion in the following paragraphs with smooth examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one side, every person wants to live without any rules and laws. Mainly because there are some regulations, which do not improve the country's economy or the lifestyle of residents. For instance, the government imposes high taxes on the population in some cities. As a result of this consequence, the number of destitute families is considerably accelerating day by day, and the risks of poverty are increasing. In addition, some employees are suffering from the long-hour works in some regions, and they receive an insufficient salary for their labor. Therefore, living without laws and rules seems a significant opportunity for the majority of individuals.
On the other hand, restrictions and rules lead to the golden future. That is because inhabitant's ambition is limitless, and if they do whatever they want, this could bring a plethora of damages and drawbacks to the economy, environment, and the other spheres. The authorities always legislate new regulations according to some reasons. For example, in Singapour, if someone throws rubbish on the roads, he/she should pay the compulsory taxes for these types of actions. As a result of this trend, the population can diminish the damages, which are influencing adversely to the environment. Furthermore, some rules and laws imposed in order to reduce the interference of humanity to the globe and illustrate the correct way of performing any work by the official authorities.
In conclusion, it is evident that nobody can live without regulations, however, some unfair rules should be banned or facilitate.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27906976744 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98934285127 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584717607973 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0712490202 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3125 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234046907698 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709878005417 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102346843486 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15073387209 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127455118973 0.056905535591 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.