Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Views regarding the origin of leadership divide. It is believed to be innate by some and able to be cultivated throughout time by others. Both views will be dissected in the following essay.
On one hand, there are compelling arguments showing that leadership is a fixed quantity. Natural leaders are often depicted to possess certain traits, such as strong facial features, a natural grace of movement or a commanding voice. These intrinsic traits can manifest at a very young age and be sustained throughout a person’s life time, as witnessed in the case of the successful entrepreneur Jack Ma or the TV host Oprah Winfrey.
On the other hand, the capacity to command has been proven to be more deliberate than spontaneous. Leadership is a skill that could be learned, through ongoing mentoring, self-reflection and real-world experience. For instance, despite his apparent lack of verbal eloquence and stage presence, Elon Musk’s early years of launching and managing different projects through turbulences have cultivated his leadership skills, enabling him to succeed with new companies such as Tesla or SpaceX. Also, it is worth noting that even gifted leaders will still have to learn from and adapt to practical contexts to gain effective leading strategies. Despite his prodigious talents, Steve Jobs’s inability to inspire led to his ouster from Apple before he restrategised his approach, embracing others’ viewpoint and assigning competent people to rightful positions.
Stemming from the aforementioned arguments, I hold the belief that while indeed there are observable traits to leaders, institutional practices constituent a larger share of a person’s success in managing and inspiring others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... and be sustained throughout a person’s life time, as witnessed in the case of the succes...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, still, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51503759398 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02369007655 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676691729323 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9570977579 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151936968886 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541637784677 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308677316805 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819954502182 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415710361807 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.