In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Taking for granted that processed food has become prevalence due to the hectic pace of life. The predominant factor resulting in health hazards is the excessive consumption of processed food. Hence, a vigorous debate has been sparked over whether concerned authorities should levy a surcharge on processed food. It seems to me that this paradigm arguably fails to address the real problem.
First, imposing a levy on convenience food will neither curb nor satisfy the desire of eating it. This is because people have less time to prepare wholesome food so that they prefer to purchase convenience food in order to save time. A good example is employees at the workplace, they have a predilection for ordering ready-cooked food from fast food restraint, such as KFC and Burger King, as they do not have enough time.
Second, by applying a surcharge on fast food, their prices will soar which contributes to a decline in demand for fast food. To enumerate, Lowe income group is less likely to consume fast food, but affluent consumers will continue to purchase fast food. Taking the USA as an instance, the price of fast food is high, yet a large number of people tend to buy it as the statistics indicate owing due to a lavish lifestyle. As a result, increasing the levy could have a peripheral impact on eating too much fast food.
In conclusion, the primary cause of health issues is eating fast food rather than a healthier one. However, it deems to me that levying a surcharge on processed food is impractical as it will not deter people from consuming fast food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ce, the price of fast food is high, yet a large number of people tend to buy it as the statistics...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84444444444 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64602090162 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562962962963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7105209118 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320670468449 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126500252872 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487970656266 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200614354183 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451456930629 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.