In some countries, it is illegal for some companies to reject jobs application because of their age. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is witnessed that in many nations, firms are banned from applying age restriction to their recruitment. While its disadvantages are discernible, it seems to me that this policy offers more benefits.
On the one hand, when companies are prohibited to take age into account in evaluating candidates, the most conspicuous drawback stems from a health perspective. Indeed, it is obvious that the older an applicant is, the less robust he will be. Thus, if senior citizens are no longer hindered from applying for a number of vacancies, they possibly embark on strenuous work in a poor working environment, which may leave them exhausted, injured and, consequently, pose threats to their well-being. However, there has been a consensus that it is only the labourers themselves that are able to thoroughly assess if they are physically competent for a job or not. In other words, any concern over their safety may be redundant, since individuals have already pondered over them and viewed themselves fitting the job descriptions.
On the other hand, I opine that lifting the age restriction in job applications will be advantageous to both employers and employees. Regarding employers, this is believed to beat their stereotype about correlation between how old an individual is and his capabilities. For example, as soon as all age groups can be recruited, they may discover that a high school student has acquired enough knowledge and skills to bring about a massive influx of money to their business despite his lack of experience in life; as a result, the companies are more likely to select well-qualified personnels. Regarding employees, no sooner had age discrimination been outlawed than their accessibility to a wider range of positions was enhanced. Hence, their job opportunities can be broadened, and in the long-term, this acts as a catalyst for their financially independent life with a higher level of autonomy.
In conclusion, although the repercussions of tackling age discrimination at workplaces can be sufficiently examined, I genuinely hold a view that this is generally a beneficial legal action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... acquired enough knowledge and skills to bring about a massive influx of money to...
^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir job opportunities can be broadened, and in the long-term, this acts as a cat...
^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is generally a beneficial legal action.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29289940828 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21591100787 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62426035503 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.57842417 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.615384615 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185385925449 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624228157517 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329037580098 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939370243635 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575961792462 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.