In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed their education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ?
In recent years, there has been a trend that the mature who are graduated and employed tend to move in with their parents, instead of living independently. While this tendency may have some positive impacts, I would argue that its minus points are more glaring.
There is no denying that continuing living with parents would bring the grown-ups some benefits. Firstly, they could save a great deal of money. They can save on rent, utility bills, grocery bills, and so forth. Another advantage of this trend is the satisfaction of helping and taking care of their parents. The closer people are to their parents, the more chances they can help them. Especially, when the parents get severe diseases, the offspring should be with them for better care. Moreover, living with parents would give people a sense of continuity and familiarity. In some cases, when people move away from their families just after being graduated and employed, they may feel homesick and isolated. Therefore, still being with families certainly brings the mature a cozy and safe feeling.
In spite of the aforementioned advantages, living with parents at early adulthood certainly produces some adverse effects on adults. The first one is that they might have less privacy and freedom. Mature though people are, they still can be controlled and restricted by their parents. For instance, without their parents' permission, they cannot hang out with friends overnight or invite them to their houses. The uncomfortable feelings from those events can lead to negative emotions among adults. Secondly, still living with parents at early adulthood would result in more conflicts. The culprit is the wide generation gap between family members. Growing up under different circumstances and environments, each generation is likely to have a different take on how life should be lived and how the family should interact, thus enhancing the likelihood of quarrels. As a result, the bond among family members would be broken. Furthermore, adults may not gain life experiences when living with parents. There are a lot of tough lessons in work and life and learning to catch them is part of growing up. By living with families, people are shielding themselves from not only hardships, but also the valuable lessons life has to offer.
In conclusion, while residing with parents at adulthood could do people a service, I would contend that the minus points of this trend outnumber its plus points.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat its minus points are more glaring. There is no denying that continuing livi...
^^^
Line 4, column 1205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lessons'' or 'lesson's'?
Suggestion: lessons'; lesson's
...t only hardships, but also the valuable lessons life has to offer. In conclusion, w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he valuable lessons life has to offer. In conclusion, while residing with paren...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16209476309 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59051235981 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533665835411 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8125631313 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7083333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.79166666667 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287366574071 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815486468803 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560944644742 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168915226937 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675916778105 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.