In some countries, the quality of life in larger cities is declining.
Why do you think this is happening? What measures can be taken to stop it.?
Over the past few years, regardless of dramatic impacts stemmed from the strides on various aspects when being lived in a plethora of metropolises, a group of nations have born the brunt of decreasing the condition of people life. I strongly hold a belief that there are several culprits leading to this onerous problem, however, a host of feasible approaches need taking into consideration to eradicate this prevailing phenomenon.
As this matter of fact, there are a few rationales to explain why the quality of people living in large cities would gradually curb from year to year. The first problem is gotten involved in the environment which is considered as one of the most crippling problems from the past to the present. In fact, to facilitate human-living conditions, the upsurge of manufactures industries have a tendency to increase in terms of quantity, resulting in the number of corollaries not only to their lives but also the environment. To be more specific, the means of transportation which is derived from these industries, have a predisposition to discharge a large influx of gas emissions to the environment, and thus this not only would plunge the environment into utter destruction but also take its toll on the state of people’s health regarding respiratory diseases. Another fact is that there has been an increasing number of criminal activities which is well-known as the grappling problem to lower the quality of residents. The reason is that the rate of unemployment which is grown-up could be the main culprits spurring an ineluctable problem such as stealing materialistic belongings or turning on serious crimes. This could be the last solution for them to conduct it by virtue of retaining their lives.
As far as the alleviation of people’s life is concerned, though the aforementioned repercussions, a plethora of plausible methods are designed to put an end to this obstacle. First and foremost, the governments who have to avail their power to create a multitude of meetings for citizens to raise their perception when it comes to detrimental corollaries derived from wrecking the environment. As a result, this is able to encourage inhabitants living in metropolises to join hands with the governments to eradicate this destruction. In other words, the authorities could pose a multitude of threats to offenders such as giving longer prison sentences, acting as a deterrence to minimize the rate of offenders nowadays. Owing to this efficient solution, inhabitant’s life is likely to be triggered far-reaching improvements considerably.
In conclusion, as cited above, in spite of detrimental corollaries from this prevailing problem in respect of decreasing people’s life, there are a host of plausible solutions mentioned could reach a high level of effectiveness to address this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...f decreasing people’s life, there are a host of plausible solutions mentioned could ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 41.998997996 200% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2398.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 452.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30530973451 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2174409926 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537610619469 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.205255022 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.866666667 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1333333333 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122633795121 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453142834567 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359383977431 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771907507294 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00755661330598 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.