Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
At present, the necessity of foreign language has become a controversial matter of school curriculum. Some consider that it should be taught from primary school, the benefits of which would be sufficiently superior in comparison with that of secondary school. In the following essay, both aspects will be examined before submitting personal opinion.
From one angle, there are some faults with this reasoning. First of all, starting learn the other languages at such early age seems to be rather challenging for young brain as the ones may still have struggles related to native language itself. As a consequence, children may find it hard the attendance to school. Secondly, the more strain should be given to fundamental basic school subjects such as math, mother tongue and literature. One reason for this is that there would be less time remaining if foreign language is added to school scheme. Thus, it would be great, as long as other languages are placed from secondary school.
From another angle, there is no doubt that infants are more capable in acquiring other languages much more easily without spending much efforts and facing difficulties. Since, the young brain is adopted to store certain information or knowledge in the memory smoothly. Therefore, the younger children start to be taught foreign language, the more effective the ones could acquire it. In addition, it is particularly significant that the most attention has been given to the international language which is crucially important to be educated in developing countries. This can be explained by innovated technologies, most of which are operated by using English.
Having investigated both aspects objectively, it appears to me that the priority of adding foreign language to primary school schedule is weigh more than that of secondary school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ects will be examined before submitting personal opinion. From one angle, there are some faults...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...uages much more easily without spending much efforts and facing difficulties. Since,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29553264605 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80958887278 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1643859017 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288793705871 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101123595861 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790605453909 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196249086827 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828292996412 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.