Nowadays, it is widely argued whether giving to kids what they want and saying yes to everything they request is the best approach for parents in terms of raising their children. I personally believe that this is a hazardous method which could cause serious long-term effects to young people as they grow up.
In general, I can understand that being indulgent to your kid’s wishes, has its short-term advantages. For example, a child feels loved by its parents, since they listen what it has to say to them, and immediately fulfill its wishes. However, that is not a good method for raising kids, because it gives to children the upper hand on determining what they need. Speaking from personal experience, my parents always paid attention to what I had to say, but never said to yes to my requests, if they considered them inappropriate. Therefore, I always trusted their decisions because I understood that they were looking my best interest.
Now, this approach of parenting should, also, be avoided due to its long-term consequences to young children growing up. First of all, young people begin to lose respect towards their parents and start to act in whatever manner they want. They do not take advice by anyone, and often times, behave violently and commit to crimes. Recent studies indicate that almost 50 percent of young inmates has stopped from a young age to be in touch with its parents. In addition, when a person feels that it is the center of attention it faces difficulties growing up with respect to socializing with others and becoming a member of wider groups. That is because he is not used to interact and to listen to other people’s opinion and thoughts.
In conclusion, I consider as a bad style of parenting fulfilling every desire of their children, especially due to its longstanding consequences to kids as they begin to grow up.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87421383648 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70263947213 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569182389937 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8636356577 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366182380204 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121863934192 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103545870271 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243507155837 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552262844965 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.