Teaching styles have been changed drastically over there period of time, so as the teachers approach towards children as well. Earlier it was considered that a strict teaching approach is best practice to follow, but now things are entirely changed. Presently they are more friendly with their students. Some still believe that former is the best strategy but others favor the latter.
On the one hand, people think that, strict teaching styles still have its relevance because of the current scenario. Todays parents are very friendly with their children, so at least in schools they should be taught in strict supervision. Then only they will understand the importance of learning. Furthermore, fear about teachers help the children to remember what they have been studied in the schools even after so many years. On top of that, children needs to experience some hard times in their earlier stages of their life, that will help them in future especially when they start their career.
On the flip side of the coin, modern teaching experts say that, teachers should adopt a proactive strategy when guiding the students. They should think from their prospective, that way teachers gets more acceptance among children. In addition, students nowadays expecting a parental like approach from their teachers, because many of the students missing that in their home. Most importantly, schools should maintain a child friendly environment rather than a prison type one, then only children come to schools regularly. For instance, according to the recent studies by the American education institute, more than half of the school drop outs are due to rude teaching strategies.
In my opinion, a friendly approach is more practical than the traditional method. Because it gives a child more freedom and relaxation when they are at schools also this will help the child's learning process positively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ave been changed drastically over there period of time, so as the teachers approach towards ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...sidered that a strict teaching approach is best practice to follow, but now things are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he childs learning process positively.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, then, well, at least, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54209709054 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569078947368 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2828784813 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262502605197 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872778307914 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568409881726 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158689268199 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048731736798 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.