Teaching children separately depends upon their ability always a controversial issue. Some people argue children should be taught separately according to their abilities, while others oppose it. This essay checks both sides of the argument before draws a conclusion.
The people who have the former view put forward some good reason support their stand. first and foremost, intelligent students can be an asset for their nation in the future so they should be taught separately. When a pupil who has above average intelligence placed in the same class with average students, he/she will miss the chance to excel in studies. The average students in the class grasp the lessons slower than the above average students. Thus, the intelligent students loose both their time as well as the chance to learn more. Gradually they will become adjusted to the pace of the average students learning time. For instance, mathematics is generally considered a tough subject for most of the students however, some students do extremely well on this subject. If mathematics expert students kept in the same class with other students, they will not improve their potential.
On the other hand, people with the latter view have some genuine reasons to justify their stand. First of all, keeping discrimination between pupils causes a detrimental effect on them especially on below averaged students. They may think that they have a low intelligence comparing to other children. For example, child psychologists have an opinion and advice towards the society that in any situation try to avoid discriminating children based n their abilities. This may lead them to depression. Thus, categorising children based on their abilities will have a negative effect on children and should not do it.
To conclude, by assessing both sides of the argument I too have the latter view as it will affect children negatively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... argument before draws a conclusion. The people who have the former view put ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...d some good reason support their stand. first and foremost, intelligent students can ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...elligent students loose both their time as well as the chance to learn more. Gradually the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to time'
Suggestion: to time
...e pace of the average students learning time. For instance, mathematics is generally...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey will not improve their potential. On the other hand, people with the latte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fect on children and should not do it. To conclude, by assessing both sides of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2393442623 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71461550292 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544262295082 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4201545438 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209214717411 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736946929809 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664480795475 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15231887247 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703141115169 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.