The maps depict the development taking place in an unspecified city since 1950. Looking from an overall perspective, this city has been renovated extensively, with the expansion of the residential area, and that this place has become more urbanized for accommodation and economy during the given period.
There was a river running across the village from west to east. The airport was situated in the southeast of the map in 1950, after which it has been extended to the present day. The business district was located to the north of the river in 1950, it then has been expanded southward at present. the residential area previously positioned in the uppermost part of the map, currently being enlarged in all directions so as to offer accommodation for 200 thousand people, which was fourfold higher than the demographic of this city in 1950.
Another modification is that a dam has been built to the northwest of the airport in present-day in order to create a big lake along the river that stretches from the western to the eastern edge of the residential area. There are now additions of more major roads in the southside of the city, which could allow people to conveniently commute. The bridge over the river, which was in the heart of the city in 1950, is now over the lake and a second bridge has been constructed to the east of the dam in the present. The number of the government building has been increased from 1 to 2 at present, with an old building being reduced in size and a new one being erected to the south of this city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...has been expanded southward at present. the residential area previously positioned ...
^^^
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rently being enlarged in all directions so as to offer accommodation for 200 thousand pe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65567765568 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65705913291 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509157509158 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5748268986 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.1 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0374118129435 0.244688304435 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0149773024584 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253100234081 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0241678009374 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181319161397 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.