Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Whether new museums and town halls could be built instead of renovating the old ones has triggered a spirited debate amongst individuals. Some argue that they should be renovated, while others believe new ones must be established instead.
First and foremost, new buildings must be established rather than improving the old museums and town halls. By so doing, the durability will be enhanced hence such buildings could last for the next decades. For instance, in Botswana, a town hall in a particular village, “Molepolole”, after continuous renovations over the years, collapsed following a heavy rainfall in 2015. Therefore, it is very clear that such structure was no longer capable of sustenance as it had been there for a longer time. As a consequence, valuables were destroyed, and the money which was spent on refurbishing the building had all gone to waste.
In contrary, improving the old town halls and museums saves the state an exorbitant amount of money which could have been otherwise be used in setting up a new building. Erecting a new structure is expensive than refurbishing an old one. For example, it shall account for a new plan, as result experts should be engaged, new building materials, and a plot for setting up such a structure within. Moreover, renovation would save the land as the same land is used rather than seeking for a new a land may be used for other projects instead.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that setting up new museums and town halls is beneficial in terms of saving the cost during harsh conditions as well as durability. However, I assert that renovating these buildings is the best option.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01444043321 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97248522138 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0526231619 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208653143405 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815250376176 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038913054081 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137233891512 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205145437816 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.