Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give our own opinion.
In this advanced era where our literacy rate has been increasing significantly for over decade, the way of accessing such knowledge stays still debatable. Some people argue that society should consume any relevant data freely, while others view that prominent sources are too highly important to be shared freely.
First of all, we have to look closely to our society, regardless the economic situation between countries is unparalleled. The charging system on an information will impact on unequal literacy. Giving such information of how to prevent malaria, for example, should be liberated freely. Consequently, if that valuable information is denied because of insufficient income, an unfortunate community in Africa will live desperately on fighting malaria due to lack of knowledge on certain diseases.
Contrastively, carrying on the importance of a scientist and valuable knowledge should be prioritized rather than giving it away. Most importantly, the maturity of science and its development cannot be cultivated so easily because it needs sufficient funds. And the income could be generated from tagging price on a skillful information.Therefore the readers and consumers should appreciate the scientist's effort.
However, in my point of view, the matter of how we value the information should be given to academician interest. Some of them sense fulfilled when their scientific result is applied or cited by a number of people, and yet they never take advantage from their work only pure for humanity. Furthermore, few of them may embody a price-tag on their work in order to suspend delayed jobs or even maintain their welfare. Despite that, a government should put their hand on prolonging scientific research by injecting fund to academician. As a result, both sides, researcher, and readers do not feel disadvantaged.
Above all, whether paid article or unpaid one we should appreciate the scientist individually. Only them have right to speak about their worked skill, and we merely add a support. Furthermore, the support should not come only from the public but also a government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...tagging price on a skillful information.Therefore the readers and consumers should apprec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...tagging price on a skillful information.Therefore the readers and consumers should apprec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...ers and consumers should appreciate the scientists effort. However, in my point of vie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould appreciate the scientists effort. However, in my point of view, the matter...
^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from the public but also a government.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40121580547 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10052445726 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653495440729 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8538683513 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.529411765 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177004761488 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506912221408 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699424290926 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896703887448 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651919058278 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.