Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that specialists trained in areas including medicines and enginering should be obliged to practice in the nations where they receive their education, while many people claim that those people should have the liberty to work in foreign nations. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and later explains the rationale for my supporting of the former.
Supporters of the conviction that professionals should be working in the country which provides their training have seveval justifications. The first one is that those specialists are already familiar with the working environments and cultural norms of their homeland, which enables them to perform with more efficiency for the citizens. Additional reason is that occupations such medical practitioners or engineering workers are fundamental for the long-term development of any nation. If experts especially those in developing and underdeveloped nations have the discretion to relocate abroad, human capital flight would surely ensue. Eventually, the country’s workforce might become underqualifed, slowing down its progress.
On the other hand, there are many benefits regarding the liberty to work in a foreign land. The first advantage is this freedom allows them to earn better salaries and enjoy higher living standards. To illustrate, many registered nurses in Vietnam have immigrated to work in medical centers in the United States where they are paid nearly three times as much as in their hometown and could have a more democratic and transparent government in contrast to a corrupted political system in Vietnam. In addition, people might have opportunities to learn new things. This is because working in other nations especially developed ones means individuals could be exposed to more advanced and innovative knowledge and gain experience which would never be taught in their homeland.
In conclusion, I believe both sides have their merits. However, in my opinion, the case for requiring experts to find jobs in their own nation is stronge. The reason is that the freedom of working abroad is only desirable to experts’ careers and lives while hardly benefiting their homeland. Therefore, I suggest that governments should have better employment policies to attract those skilled workers to seek jobs locally.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52676056338 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89079694939 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571830985915 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8481097932 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273975754577 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814499504585 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807597532205 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167726164013 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502732787134 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.