Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies, while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that robots would become a pivotal part in humans’ lives while many claim that they might have detrimental consequences on human beings. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and later explains the rationale for my support of the former.
On the one hand, it is true that robots would be greatly significant in the development of our civilization. In the clinical settings, since medical robotic machines offer advantages including high precision, lower risk of infection, their compact sizes and more, they are used to assist in surgeries for complicated diseases, which increases patients’ survival rates. In manufacturing, the automation of production lines has eliminated dangerous and high-risk jobs for humans to undertake as machines can work in hazardous and toxic environments, thereby reducing work accidents and the associated health risks in the long term. In agriculture, the application of advanced robotic technologies in irrigation, monitoring crops growth, weather prediction, and pest control has allowed farmers especially those in developing nations to signficantly increase crop yields, which eventually would help alleviate food insecurity issues in those nations.
On the other hand, some are convinced that the use of the robotics technology might have undesirable impacts on humanity. The first one is the massive layoffs of employees, causing mass employment. This is because their jobs would be replaced by robots, which could not only outperform them with better precision and at faster speed but also are more cost-effective. An additional shortcoming is that robots can be tempting targets for cyber criminals. More precisely, they can hack into the robot’s control softwares remotely and turn it into a dangerous weapon for their malicious purposes. To illustrate, there are instances where terrorists infiltrated into a robot-automated vehicle’s computer to direct it to crash into a building, which killed a number of innocent people.
In my conclusion, I believe that both sides have their own merits. However, in my opinion, the case for robots becoming indispensible in societies is stronger since the mentioned disadvantages could easily be minimized by better employment policies and improved cyber security. Therefore, I suggest that governments should encourage the research and development of robotic advancements to further benefit human beings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'many claims'.
Suggestion: many claims
...e a pivotal part in humans’ lives while many claim that they might have detrimental conseq...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to assisting'.
Suggestion: used to assisting
... their compact sizes and more, they are used to assist in surgeries for complicated diseases, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sociated health risks in the long term. In agriculture, the application of advance...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6602739726 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0850166659 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.810738906 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.733333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185448191018 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634690152958 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531493682281 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116882019056 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401490411539 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.