Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
That the punishments should be imposed on criminals equally has controversial. Several people argue that it is eligible to serve the same penalty on every kind of crime while other presume that court should take into consideration different punishments relying on the level and reasons of committing a crime. This essay will discuss both opinions.
To begin with, there are some advantages to enact fixed punishments for each type of crime. First and foremost, this rule will act as a deterrent and will be useful measure to tackle rising crime. Due to the fact that people will be afraid of being sentenced to jail even though they commit a soft crime, the rate of crime well decline significantly. Secondly, it is fair for all offenders to apply the similar punishments. For example, wrongdoers can not use money to decrease the level of punishment. In addition, it can save money for country which imposes fixed punishments. In detailed, governments do not need to spend a huge budge establishing court to commit a crime because penalties are similar in any cases.
On the other hand, there are some reasons to impose flexible punishments on separate crimes. Firstly, it is essential to understand the causes why people have committed criminalities. For example, people who break the law because of starvation should be punished by non-custodial sentence while serious crimes such as murder or assassinator should be served a long prison sentence or capital punishment.
In conclusion, although there are some positive influences which fixed punishments bring to human, I strongly believe that authorities should enact different punishments depending on situations and reasons which result in committing a crime.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in any case, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29454545455 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93726358289 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7405168052 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436481722678 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137401092493 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942898382993 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264980968075 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271425020785 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.