Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The flexibility of enforcing laws has fallen into argumentative topics of discussion. Some people suppose that it depends on the situation to consider on the punishment, especially when criminals are to do evils for some good motivations. However, other's views different from that the circumstance under which people have wrong actions should be taken into account so that fixed laws see no tolerance for any kind of crimes.
It is a bit understandable that the preference of the judges is supposed to make room for the circumstance of a crime and its intentions prior to making the decision. For example, a certain number of people due to the fact people in some extreme cases such as drought, flooding or even self-defence commit crimes just to survive. Nevertheless, human actions and emotions are very natural and it is difficult to predict what they are thinking. That makes it challenging for the judges to determine their punishment. As a result, it is hard to establish for justice and equity.
To be exact, I think that is the arbitrary law system, the fixed punishments that do work in many aspects. For one thing, it can strengthen the jurisdiction of law and especially fills an indispensable role in avoiding the resistance or even riots in public. To a large extent, it can make criminals feel scared and ensure a safe living environment for law-abiding citizens. In another hand, this practice is surely a great consolation to the victims, for quite a few of them firmly hold that their loss of property or beloved must be compensated by merciless punishments based on fixed laws.
In conclusion, to ensure that society can run smoothly before the relatively perfect establishment of equity and justice, the majority of cases have to decide by settled laws
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, then, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97643097643 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96581589006 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5487254545 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315993610155 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913504321562 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666883862905 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156826205679 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906566060095 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.