SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THERE SHOULD BE FIXED PUNISHMENTS FOR EACH TYPE OF CRIME. OTHERS, HOWEVER ARGUE THAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF AN INDIVIDUAL CRIME, AND THE MOTIVATION FOR COMMITTING IT, SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN DECIDING ON THE PUNISHMENT.
DISCUSS BOTH THESE VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION.
There are certain consideration of factor which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine whether people should be punished for each sort of crime or under which condition the crime is committed. I certainly believe that size of punishments should be related about the situation. Someone can evidently weigh the pros and cons of my each reasons. The reasons on which my stance is based are discussed in details below.
The first reason coming to mind substantiating my stance point is concerned with this issue that justice. If punishments is always sam efor each kind of crime, that would not be fair. In addition, with tihs unfairness, people would have conflicts each other, as a result new crimes might take place. The best example that fit this notion is the news I watched in television that about a thief. One of two guys stole other’s bicycle and then the owner of the bicycle suffered the thief with a knife. After the court decision, they both got same punishments 6 months in prison. After that there had been conflicts among their families, this is because of thinking injustice decision.
Another vital reason which deserves some word here is the reason of crime. Itis important to consider under what what affect to crime. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is self-defence. Although killing a people is one of the biggest crime, you can kill a person who is trying to kill you. Without a shadow of doubt, people should protect their life in danger.
Having considered all the aforementioned grounds discussed above, I am of opinion that punishments should be classified by diverse crimes. I strongly advocate my points owing to they are well enough convincing reasons form y approval
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: what
...crime. Itis important to consider under what what affect to crime. A vivid example can be...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, well, in addition, kind of, sort of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92567567568 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62757056995 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3753787858 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253598396004 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701569210682 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804408698421 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147606887522 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740252485951 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.