There are a few individuals who advocate that volunteering should be made mandatory as part of high-school academic module. I completely agree with this statement. While such unpaid contribution helps kids learn a valuable life skill, it also motivates an individual to do something noble for the community where they live. Apart from that, in the world where humanity is gradually winking out, it offers a sort of support to promote humanity through financially unbacked charity.
From my point of view, kids in the present world are constantly faced with the dilemma of whether they should go ahead helping someone in need. This conception typically comes from the fact that they believe the person who is struggling is just because of his own deeds. However, it is not the case with everyone as there might be some economic or non-economic cause for their inability to lift themselves out of melancholy. So when they work in the community, they will understand why these people were wrestling for something. On top of that, it kindles burning passion for action within children when they stumble across family and they end up showing love by making substantial financial contribution to helping those in need.
Similarly, we may have often seen people avoiding those who are in dire need of help. This shows that humanity is slowly becoming extinct. Educational institutions have a good chance of indoctrinating these essential values in high-school kids who might grow up to become oblivious about people around them. By making charity a part of their course, they can let children know the secret of true happiness, that is, by putting someone else's interest above one's own.
To sum up, it is only possible to make humans many more times a human by teaching today's generation what humanity entails and why it should be a purpose of every individual's life. This, therefore, can be instilled by making high-school pupils to undertake free volunteering as part of their course.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...and why it should be a purpose of every individuals life. This, therefore, can be instilled...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, sort of, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06042296073 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74374137937 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628398791541 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5757283233 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191759404072 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590745800393 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397262889737 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111863162461 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216495718448 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.