Some people believe that visual images (such as photos and videos) provide enough evidence that a crime was committed. Others think that they are not enough on their own and other evidence is needed. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In modern times, proving that someone has committed an illegal act has been a challenging issue. While many feel that materials like photos and videos have enhanced the verification of a crime, there are others who opine that courts need more evidence to end up with such a decision. This essay examines both views and explains why I agree with the latter statement.
Supporters of the optical data argue that they ease the process of an offense. Indeed, visual stuff would ameliorate the judges who cannot assure about a rulebreaker, mainly for crimes that can be recorded, like rape, handlifting or robbery. Photos of the criminal area, for instance, or video of the offender the moment that rapes a girl, would definitely show the person, the objects used or even the whole criminal scene. Clearly, If hidden or security cameras visualized a crime step by step, it would become more convenient for the court to make a decision.
Even though there are benefits of the digital evidence, the opponents of them, myself included, believe that they are not sufficient in all cases. Undoubtedly, there are crimes which cannot be videotaped, and therefore cannot be proved by images, even if we live in a digital culture. Take the white-collar crimes as an example; these types of illegal acts are financially motivated, committed by businesses or governmental professionals, and include cybercrime, terrorism and state-corporate crime. In cases like these, the visual material should be replaced by documentary evidence and testimonials in order to prove someone's guilt. Obviously, economic crimes could never be displayed in images.
In conclusion, although the audiovisual evidence could provide judges with the information concerning a crime scene, I am of the belief that they are not adequate in all crimes, since there are ones which cannot be caught by a camera
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun feel seems to be countable; consider using: 'many feels'.
Suggestion: many feels
...act has been a challenging issue. While many feel that materials like photos and videos h...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in all cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18481848185 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82586507159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9466596567 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180809664754 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571405421709 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436225288523 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108381473696 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424884114024 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.