Some people get into debt by buying things they do not need and cannot afford.
What are the reasons for this behavior?
What actions can be taken to prevent people from having this problem?
Nowadays, a substantial proportion of people are buying unnecessary items even though they cannot sustain the costs which lead to being burdened with debt. Hence, questions are raised about the rational justification behind this demeanor and the approaches to tackle this issue. This essay will examine the reasons and propose measures to solve it.
To begin with, the primary cause seems to stem from the advertising. To enumerate, the use of commercial advertising could entice consumers to purchase superfluous products which are unaffordable, so that they become overwhelmed with debt. For example, renowned celebrities have been being used in advertisements in order to tempt a wide range of fans to imitate their endearing stars by buying the commodity in the commercial. As a result, not only does this attitude conduces to rising the profligate spending habit, but it also contributes to incurring heavy debts.
Nonetheless, the key to inhibiting the growth of this trend deems to lie in conducting awareness campaigns. This might assist purchasers to perceive the negative repercussion of buying needless items at exorbitance prices. Therefore, they are more likely to ponder over buying within their budget, thereby reducing buying impetuously, and the brunt of debt could be avoided. Thus, if individuals are encouraged to spend money wisely, the adverse implication of buying worthless objects will most probably be ameliorated.
In conclusion, the predominant factor resulting in debt from purchasing redundant staff which cannot be afforded is the advertisements, but by virtue of organizing outreach programs, this issue could be addressed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'conduce'?
Suggestion: conduce
...s a result, not only does this attitude conduces to rising the profligate spending habit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59683794466 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02621251097 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675889328063 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8292660705 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265105029815 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842442997411 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424992823046 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157288813506 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405171155525 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.